We have scorned our gay brothers and sisters instead of embracing them. According to the data, 4. Black communities associate the disease almost exclusively with gay white men and not their own community. Irene Monroe of the Huffington Post wrote:
Heretics, Activists, and the Search for Justice in Science, has recently been released. As I say in the last paragraph of my peer commentary: As a scientist myselfI feel that it is important that we defend scientific freedom of expression.
But we must also recognize that with that freedom comes the responsibility not to abuse our positions as scientists. Unfortunately, there has been a long history of dubious research that has lent scientific credence to prejudiced beliefs that already exist in the culture: Often, such studies are embraced by the public despite their methodological flaws because they reaffirm and reinforce presumptions and biases that already dominate in the culture.
You can read my entire peer commentary, A Matter of Perspective: Despite the fact that those reviews were published five years ago, I suspect that Dreger did not bother to cite them at all in her book. I suppose this because, in my experience, Dreger is someone who prefers to make the evidence or the omission thereof fit her thesis.
And this concerns me as both a trans woman and a scientist. I appreciated and accepted the offer. Gagnon, Riki Lane, Robin M. For instance, this is how I put it in my peer commentary: Framing the issue this way dumbs down transsexual perspectives of gender.
In my experience, most trans people recognize that gender identity, sexual orientation, and gender expression all vary from one another and interact in different and sometimes confounding ways from person to person.
In fact, most trans critiques of autogynephilia center on the fact that this scientifically unsubstantiated theory forces all trans women into one of two rigid categories, nonconsensually defines us in ways that contradict our own personal sense of selves, mistakes correlation for causation, handwaves away nonpathological alternative models that better explain the data, unnecessarily sexualizes and delegitimizes our identities, and has the potential to jeopardize our access to sex reassignment and our social and legal status as women e.
Narratives can differ from person to person although some are no doubt more rooted in reality than others. In contrast, autogynephilia is a scientific theory of transgender taxonomy and etiology, and as such, it can be either substantiated or disproven via scientific research.
So perhaps Dreger stopped caring about the theory, and did not bother updating her thesis during those interim years? She only shares the opinions of Blanchard, Bailey, and Lawrence all die-hard proponents of the theoryand never once mentions any serious criticisms of the theory.
The truth is that most of us who are opposed to autogynephilia theory do so because 1 it is scientifically invalid, and 2 some people use this pseudoscience to invalidate us. When Dreger, today intalks about autogynephilia theory as though it is valid, with no serious consideration of the numerous lines of evidence that disprove it, then she peddling pseudoscience, plain and simple.
Bill 77 passed nevertheless.
Such treatment is no longer considered ethical. So the largest and most long-standing trans health organization, and the transgender community at large, both think that gender conversion therapies are unethical.
Those are the facts. So readers never learn about the real-life horror stories detailed in those three previous links. She tries to make the case that the bill will somehow shuttle young children into transgender identities, puberty-delaying hormone regimes, and eventual surgeries.
But somehow Dreger morphs the bill into hypothetical horror stories about gender non-conforming children who might otherwise turn out to be happy non-trans gay people, instead becoming transgender people who ultimately physically transition.
There are so many things wrong with this passage. As a "well-adjusted trans woman," it is hard not to take offense to this sort of value judgment. On top of that, I think what is most important is that the child be well-adjusted period, and that is most likely to happen if the child is allowed to non-judgmentally explore who they are and ultimately make their own decisions about their eventual gender and sexual identities.
Which brings up an important question: What "side" is Dreger actually on here? Here are the highlights: Dreger has a genderqueer friend named Jess, who was never subjected to gender conversion therapies, yet somehow managed to become the central figure in an article purportedly about gender conversion therapies.
Yes, I would imagine so. So what is the third no doubt superfluous reason why trans people feel that Dreger has let them down?BibMe Free Bibliography & Citation Maker - MLA, APA, Chicago, Harvard.
California and New Jersey’s new laws banning talk therapy to address same-sex attraction in minors violate the rights of parents and children to seek counseling that conforms to their values. They also endanger First Amendment rights. The harmful practice of sexual orientation change efforts—also known as ex-gay, reparative or sexual conversion “therapy”—involves attempts by a therapist to change the sexual orientation.
Compendium of all course descriptions for courses available at Reynolds Community College. New court challenges are aimed at gay conversion therapy, statement on "conversion" or "reparative" therapy by change to an individual's sexual orientation is uncommon," the task force.
Aug 10, · Man convicted of threats against gay couple challenged validity of statute.